Changes in dental and medical visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. children aged 1-17 years.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted the U.S. healthcare system, but no study has examined the impact of the pandemic on utilization of dental care among U.S. children. Changes in past-year dental versus medical visits and perceived unmet health needs between 2019 and 2020 among U.S. children aged 1-17 years were examined. METHODS: National and state representative, cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Children's Health conducted during June 2019-January 2020 (i.e. pre-pandemic, n = 28 500) and July 2020-January 2021 (i.e. intra-pandemic, n = 41 380) were analysed. Any past-year visit and perceived unmet needs (i.e. delay or inability to receive needed care) were reported by the parent proxy. Weighted prevalence estimates were compared using two-tailed chi-squared tests at p < .05. Poisson regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between having dental and/or medical unmet needs during the pandemic and indicators of poor health and social wellbeing. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2020, a significantly reduced prevalence of past-year medical (87.2%-81.3%) and dental visits (82.6%-78.2%) among U.S. children aged 1-17 years (all p < .05) were observed. Correspondingly, perceived unmet needs increased by half for dental care (from 2.9% in 2019 to 4.4% in 2020) and almost one-third for medical care (from 3.2% to 4.2% in 2020). Subgroups with the highest prevalence of unmet dental need included those with low socio-economic status, living with their grandparents, uninsured and living with a smoker. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet health needs increased in general but increased more for dental than for medical care among U.S. children aged 1-17 years. Enhanced and sustained efforts will be needed to deliver targeted services towards disadvantaged segments of the population to narrow existing disparities.

Impact of telehealth versus traditional visits on pain management patients utilizing medical cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alternatives to traditional office visits have become a necessity with the recent COVID-19 outbreak, resulting in an unmatched surge in telehealth adoption. The present study was an investigation of the impact of telehealth versus traditional office visits in medical cannabis clinics treating patients for chronic pain. With 50,000,000 American adults experiencing pain and over 750,000 overdoses attributed to opioid usage, collecting research-driven evidence to increase the availability of safe, effective, and nonopioid treatment options will create positive social change. The Donabedian model was applied to measure the quality of care, focusing on structure (cannabis clinics), process (telehealth vs. traditional office visits), and outcome (visual analog scale [VAS]). The study utilized a quasi-experimental, retrospective analysis of data using multiple linear regression comparing the impact of telemedicine visits versus traditional office visits on treating five pain types in a medical cannabis clinic during a pandemic. The main finding of this study indicated that telemedicine visits were as effective as traditional office visits in treating pain. However, there was not statistically significant data to suggest that cannabis-derived medicines resulted in improved outcomes in the five pain types studied (general, back, arthritic, cancer, and migraine). Across all pain types and subjects there was an overall decrease in pain from initial visit (7.44) to follow-up visit (6.29) a decrease of 15.4% on the VAS. Expanding healthcare service treatment options that are safe, effective, and accessible in caring for chronic pain will prevent disease, improve health outcomes, and improve quality of care all leading to positive social change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

The Evolution of Primary Care Telehealth Disparities During COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth has become widely used as a novel way to provide outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but data about telehealth use in primary care remain limited. Studies in other specialties raise concerns that telehealth may be widening existing health care disparities, requiring further scrutiny of trends in telehealth use. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to further characterize sociodemographic differences in primary care via telehealth compared to in-person office visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if these disparities changed throughout 2020. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a large US academic center with 46 primary care practices from April-December 2019 to April-December 2020. Data were subdivided into calendar quarters and compared to determine evolving disparities throughout the year. We queried and compared billed outpatient encounters in General Internal Medicine and Family Medicine via binary logic mixed effects regression model and estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. We used sex, race, and ethnicity of the patient attending each encounter as fixed effects. We analyzed socioeconomic status of patients in the institution's primary county based on the patient's residence zip code. RESULTS: A total of 81,822 encounters in the pre-COVID-19 time frame and 47,994 encounters in the intra-COVID-19 time frame were analyzed; in the intra-COVID-19 time frame, a total of 5322 (11.1%) of encounters were telehealth encounters. Patients living in zip code areas with high utilization rate of supplemental nutrition assistance were less likely to use primary care in the intra-COVID-19 time frame (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P=.006). Encounters with the following patients were less likely to be via telehealth compared to in-person office visits: patients who self-identified as Asian (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and Nepali (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.72), patients insured by Medicare (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88), and patients living in zip code areas with high utilization rate of supplemental nutrition assistance (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). Many of these disparities persisted throughout the year. Although there was no statistically significant difference in telehealth use for patients insured by Medicaid throughout the whole year, subanalysis of quarter 4 found encounters with patients insured by Medicaid were less likely to be via telehealth (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth was not used equally by all patients within primary care throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically by patients who self-identified as Asian and Nepali, insured by Medicare, and living in zip code areas with low socioeconomic status. As the COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth infrastructure change, it is critical we continue to reassess the use of telehealth. Institutions should continue to monitor disparities in telehealth access and advocate for policy changes that may improve equity.

COVID-19-Related Emergency Department Visits Among Undocumented Patients in Los Angeles County

Undocumented immigrants may be vulnerable to poor COVID-19 outcomes, but also may be less likely to seek medical care. To our knowledge, there have not been any investigations of potential COVID-19 disparities by immigration status. We analyzed emergency department (ED) visit data from March 20, 2020 to September 30, 2020 among patients in a safety-net hospital in Los Angeles County (n=30,023). We compared the probability of COVID-19-related ED visits between undocumented immigrants and Medi-Cal patients. We also examined differences in these comparisons over time. Undocumented patients had higher odds of COVID-19-related ED visits than Medi-Cal patients (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.24–1.60) for all months in the study period except September. Even in the earliest days of the pandemic, undocumented patients were more likely than Medi-Cal patients to have a COVID-19-related ED visit. Additional analyses suggest this was likely because of higher COVID-19 exposure rather than differences in ED utilization.

Innovative Remote Management Solutions for the Control of Hypertension.

We stand at a critical juncture in the delivery of health care for hypertension. Blood pressure control rates have stagnated, and traditional health care is failing. Fortunately, hypertension is exceptionally well-suited to remote management, and innovative digital solutions are proliferating. Early strategies arose with the spread of digital medicine, long before the COVID-19 pandemic forced lasting changes to the way medicine is practiced. Highlighting one contemporary example, this review explores salient features of remote management hypertensive programs, including: an automated algorithm to guide clinical decisions, home (as opposed to office) blood pressure measurements, an interdisciplinary care team, and robust information technology and analytics. Dozens of emerging hypertension management solutions are contributing to a highly fragmented and competitive landscape. Beyond viability, profit and scalability are critical. We explore the challenges impeding large-scale acceptance of these programs and conclude with a hopeful look to the future when remote hypertension care will have dramatic impact on global cardiovascular health.

The 2023 CPT Coding and Medicare Payment Update

There are a host of changes that will affect family physicians, including new vaccine codes and bundled Medicare payments for chronic pain management.

In‐person MH service decline during pandemic offset by telehealth increases

Although the pandemic disrupted in‐person mental health care, that disruption was counteracted by a rapid expansion of telehealth service use by adults with such disorders as depression, anxiety and post‐traumatic stress disorder, according to new research by the RAND Corporation.

Pandemic-Related Innovations in Oncology Nursing Research: Seeking the Positive: lthough COVID-19 was a major setback for completing and initiating projects, it ushered in a new era for investigators

The article focuses on the scientists across industry, academic and healthcare settings that were forced to halt their ongoing research studies because of isolation mandates associated with the management of contagion in the COVID-19 pandemic. Topics include examines for many scientists, this unprecedented stoppage continued for many months and not only disrupted preexisting studies but delayed the development of new work.

Female LUTS adaptations to COVID era: Lessons learned from the ICS TURNOVER (Transition of fUnctional uRology to New COVID ERa).

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected the Female and Functional Urology (FFU) practice, leading to massive waiting lists, while patients' quality of life remains severely impaired. The aim of the present study is to develop consensual recommendations to guide clinicians on the management of FFU patients. The present paper focuses on female LUTS. Methods: The authors used the Delphi methodology to develop a robust survey questionnaire, covering the principal topics in FFU, based on literature review and expert opinions. Regarding female LUTS, a 98-question survey was distributed among FFU specialists to obtain optimized recommendations, under the auspicious of the International Continence Society (TURNOVER, ICS project). A quantitative analysis of the data was performed, categorizing the mean value from 0-10. Consensus achievement was defined as attaining ≥ 70% agreement. Results: 98 ICS members completed the F-LUTS survey. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of female LUTS are summarized. Video-consultation should be used for initial assessment, sending questionnaires and bladder diaries in advance to the patient to be filled out before the consultation. However, face-to-face visits are mandatory if POP or continuous incontinence are suspected, and prior to any surgical procedure, regardless of the health alert. Moreover, prescribing medications such as anticholinergics or ß 3 agonists in a telemedicine setting is not considered a safe practice. Follow-up teleconsultations can be used to assess the efficacy and treatment-related adverse events.Urodynamic testing should be only performed if consequences on F-LUTS treatment are expected. The study should be postponed until the pandemic local behaviour flattens.Invasive procedures should be postponed during a high alert. In case surgery is scheduled, outpatient clinics and local anaesthesia should be prioritized. Every patient should be screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection before invasive tests or procedures, following local authorities' guidance. Conclusions: During a pandemic, telemedicine offers a novel way of communication, maintaining medical care while preventing viral transmission. Non-urgent procedures should be postponed until the pandemic curve flattens. Ambulatory procedures under regional or local anaesthesia should be prioritized, aiming to reduce bed occupancy and risk of transmission.

Using the PEPPA framework to develop the nurse practitioner role in emergency care: Critical reflections

In this article, we describe and critically reflect on how the PEPPA framework, a Participatory Evidence-based Patient-focused Process for Advanced Practice Nursing, was used to develop a new model of care including the nurse practitioner (NP) role in an emergency department in Norway, where the role is in its infancy. While there is limited earlier research on the applicability of the PEPPA framework, it was here found to be useful. Supported by the framework, we mapped the current model of care, identified stakeholders and participants, determined the need for a new model of care, identified priority problems and goals, and defined the new model of care and the NP role. The PEPPA framework is recommended to develop new models of care including the NP role. Nonetheless, the process has not been straightforward. It is noted that to communicate and establish the new role in a setting as demanding as an emergency department takes time. Support from the management team is essential to succeed in developing and establishing new models of care and new nursing roles, such as the nurse practitioner role.

Virtual and in-person visits by Ontario physicians in the COVID-19 era.

INTRODUCTION: We examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impact on weekly trends in the billing of virtual and in-person physician visits in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, physician billing records from Ontario were aggregated on a weekly basis for in-person and virtual visits from 3 January 2016 to 27 March 2021. For each type of visit, a segmented negative binomial regression analysis was performed to estimate the weekly pre-pandemic trend in billing volume per thousand adults (3 January 2016 to 14 March 2020), the immediate change in mean volume at the start of the pandemic, and additional change in weekly volume in the pandemic era (15 March 2020 to 27 March 2021). RESULTS: Before the start of the pandemic, the weekly volume of virtual visits per thousand adults was low with a 0.5% increase per week (rate ratio [RR]: 1.0053, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0050-1.0056). A dramatic 65% reduction in in-person visits (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.32-0.39) occurred at the start of the pandemic while virtual visits grew by 21-fold (RR: 21.3, 95% CI: 19.6-23.0). In the pandemic era, in-person visits rose by 1.4% per week (RR: 1.014, 95% CI: 1.011-1.017) but no change was observed for virtual visits (p-value = 0.31). Overall, we noted a 57.6% increase in total weekly physician visits volume after the start of the pandemic. DISCUSSION: These results are meaningful for virtual care reimbursement models. Future study needs to assess the quality of care and whether the increase in virtual care volume is cost-effective to society.

Association between the reduction of face-to-face appointments and the control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during the Covid-19 pandemic in Catalonia.

AIM: To analyse the relation between face-to-face appointments and management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) visited in primary care practices (PCP). METHODS: Retrospective study in 287 primary care practices (PCPs) attending>300,000 patients with T2DM. We analysed the results of 9 diabetes-related indicators of the Healthcare quality standard, comprising foot and retinopathy screening, blood pressure (BP) and glycemic control; and the incidence of T2DM. We calculated each indicator's percentage of change in 2020 with respect to the results of 2019. RESULTS: Indicators' results were reduced in 2020 compared to 2019, highlighting the indicators of foot and retinopathy screening (-51.6% and -25.7%, respectively); the glycemic control indicator (-21.2%); the BP control indicator (-33.7%) and the incidence of T2DM (-25.6%). Conversely, the percentage of type 2 diabetes patients with HbA1c > 10% increased by 34%. PCPs with<11 weekly face-to-face appointments offered per professional had greater reductions than those PCPs with more than 40. For instance, a reduction of -60.7% vs -38.2% (p-value < 0.001) in the foot screening's indicator; -27.5% vs -12.5% (p-value < 0.001) in glycemic control and -40.2 vs -24.3% (p-value < 0.001) in BP control. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing face-to-face visits offered may impact T2DM patients' follow-up and thus worsen their control.

Virtual Care: Choosing the Right Tool, at the Right Time.

When the immediate threat of COVID-19 subsides, the future of health care will involve more virtual care. Before the pandemic, patient choice rather than clinician guidance determined which medium (telephone visits, video visits, electronic messaging) was used to receive care. Two media synchronicity theory principles-conveyance and convergence-can create a framework for determining how to choose the right medium of care for the patient. The author describes how it changed their practice and decision making with a patient story that required the use of multiple virtual care options.